This thematic area measures steps countries have taken to support the involvement of competition authorities in the development, use, and deployment of AI technologies to promote a free market.
A competitions authority, commonly referred to as a 'competitions regulator' is responsible for overseeing the fair functioning of markets in a given country.
Country and regional scores
Bright spots
Relevance
Various concerns have been raised regarding the effect of AI and dominant AI companies on the functioning of free markets.
Firstly, algorithms have the potential to assist competitors in carrying out explicit collusions, such as through the use of pricing algorithms that reflect one another's actions. This form of collusion is generally anticipated to be governed by existing competition regulations.
Secondly, scholars argue that “attention must be paid to the question of whether and to what extent an undertaking’s AI-related data(base) can lead to a dominant position on the market” especially considering network-effects that create a lock-in for consumers.
Moreover, a possible increase in tacit collusion is anticipated, known as “anti-competitive coordination, which can be achieved without any need for an explicit agreement but which competitors are able to maintain by recognizing their mutual interdependence.” This is due to increased transparency through data availability, which allows competitors to react towards each other in real time and could result in parallel behavior between market participants.
Finally, attention is drawn to the opaqueness of AI decisions, which might influence consumers negatively (e.g., through personalization of prices).
Country rankings by Competitions authorities
*In the table above, data was collected for Chinese Taipei (commonly referred to as Taiwan) and the West Bank, which is under the administration of the Palestinian Authority. No data collection took place in Gaza. We recognize that these are, at the time of writing, disputed jurisdictions.